Heat Exchanger Tubes 5 - Corrosion engineering

30 Sep.,2024

 

Heat Exchanger Tubes 5 - Corrosion engineering

INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

HPE are exported all over the world and different industries with quality first. Our belief is to provide our customers with more and better high value-added products. Let's create a better future together.

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!

  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
Join Us!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving . By joining you are opting in to receive .

Posting Guidelines



Students Click Here

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Eng-Tips Posting Policies

Contact US

5

thread338- Forum Search FAQs Links MVPs
  • Forum

  • Search

  • FAQs

  • Links

  • MVPs

Heat Exchanger Tubes

Heat Exchanger Tubes

Inchtain

(Petroleum)

(OP)

27 Jan 24 17:54

Dear Colleagues,

We have a Condenser that experienced a rapid failure of its tubes.

If the cooling water treatment was improved, do we still need to think about altering the material used.

Saying that, I wonder if SA 334 Gr. 1 carbon steel material was a good choice for this Condenser tubes; and how to guarantee the supplier will provide high quality tubes and of the same specifications needed when ordering them.

The Condenser parameters and construction is as follows:

Designation Shell Side Tube Side
Design Pressure (kg/cm2) 26 18.5
Design Temperature (ºC) 100 70
Fluid Refrigerant Propane Cooling Water
No. of Passes 1 2
Construction Code ASME VIII Div. 1 & TEMA Class R
Stress Relief None Yes, only for Channel Chamber
Radiography Full Spot

Component Material Design Thick.(mm) Corrosion Allow.(mm)
Shell ASME SA 516 Gr. 60 25 3
Elliptical Heads ASTM A 516 Gr. 60 19 (Min. 17 after forming) 3
Tubes ø = 19.05 mm (Ł = mm) SA 334 Gr.1 2.11 -
Tube Sheets SA 350 LF 2
Insulation No

And how to verify the baffles and tie-rods condition when re-tubing this condenser following the removal of the old tubes? and in case of tube break during the extraction, which is the best practice to remove the remained debris inside and clean the shell knowing that this Condenser is a fixed tube sheet heat exchanger?

I really appreciate your valuable feedback.

Thanks and best regards,


Replies continue below

Recommended for you

RE: Heat Exchanger Tubes

(Petroleum)

27 Jan 24 19:46

Cs tubes, for cooling water systems will not be a good choice.

RE: Heat Exchanger Tubes

EdStainless

(Materials)

27 Jan 24 23:33
You typically run as thin of tubes as possible which means zero corrosion allowance.
You need to look at what alloys that may be in your application.
With CS tubesheets it usually also involves coating the tubesheets (two or three layer high build epoxy)
When you retube every tube is removed, all baffle holes cleaned and gauged, all tubesheet holes are cleaned and gauged for size.
All of the internals should be inspected.
After all this is your only chance to see everything.

CS tubes in condenser service are rare.You typically run as thin of tubes as possible which means zero corrosion allowance.You need to look at what alloys that may be in your application.With CS tubesheets it usually also involves coating the tubesheets (two or three layer high build epoxy)When you retube every tube is removed, all baffle holes cleaned and gauged, all tubesheet holes are cleaned and gauged for size.All of the internals should be inspected.After all this is your only chance to see everything.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, consulting work welcomed

RE: Heat Exchanger Tubes

Inchtain

(Petroleum)

(OP)

28 Jan 24 06:11

Thanks for replying.

So, what other suggestions to upgrade the tubes material? and how to guarantee that the supplier will provide high quality tubes and of the same specifications needed when ordering them?


RE: Heat Exchanger Tubes

EdStainless

(Materials)

If you are looking for more details, kindly visit Nickel Alloy Condenser Tube.

28 Jan 24 19:36
1. Select a material
2. Get to know the specs
3. Right a short spec (don't repeat anything in the ASTM) if you want additions
4. Buy from mills that you know, if you don't know them visit them.
This is part of the procurement cost.

There are Cu based alloys (often CuNi) and stainless steels (alloys better than 316).1. Select a material2. Get to know the specs3. Right a short spec (don't repeat anything in the ASTM) if you want additions4. Buy from mills that you know, if you don't know them visit them.This is part of the procurement cost.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, consulting work welcomed

RE: Heat Exchanger Tubes

(Petroleum)

29 Jan 24 22:25

Ed gave you the answer

RE: Heat Exchanger Tubes

Dhurjati Sen

(Materials)

16 Feb 24 05:09

Check the tube edges (the portion that protrudes out of the tube sheet) to assess cooling water corrosion.

Pull out a failed tube to check shell side corrosion.

I will not worry much about the tie rods and the baffles at the moment.

Rushing for a material upgradation without a proper failure analysis is not desirable.

You need to determine whether the corrosion is shell side, or tube side, or BOTH.Check the tube edges (the portion that protrudes out of the tube sheet) to assess cooling water corrosion.Pull out a failed tube to check shell side corrosion.I will not worry much about the tie rods and the baffles at the moment.Rushing for a material upgradation without a proper failure analysis is not desirable.

DHURJATI SEN
Kolkata, India


RE: Heat Exchanger Tubes

MJCronin

(Mechanical)

16 Feb 24 13:49

... as a suggestion, I believe that you might be well served to explore the corrosion-enhanced properties of the Duplex Stainless alloy tubing ()over 304/316 series

Even the ultra-conservative ALFA LAVAL people seem to be standardizing on this alloy choice for their oilfield condensate sevices.


https://www.alfalaval.com/globalassets/documents/m....

https://ebin.pub/corrosion-control-in-the-oil-and-...

https://nickelinstitute.org/media/8dab1e8a/...

MJCronin
Sr. Process Engineer

As always, EdStainless seems to be on point .... CS was a bad choice... as a suggestion, I believe that you might be well served to explore the corrosion-enhanced properties of the Duplex Stainless alloy tubing ()over 304/316 seriesMJCroninSr. Process Engineer

RE: Heat Exchanger Tubes

2

EdStainless

(Materials)

16 Feb 24 17:22
It has much better CSCC resistance, it isn't immune but it has usable resistance.
It has much higher strength, which usually leads to thinner tubes.
You would likely go down to 0.065" or maybe thinner.
And the CTE isn't that different from steel (much closer than an austenitic SS or Cu alloy).
It is also widely available.
When you order a duplex SS always specify A923, without accepting on the micro.
This will require a special corrosion test to verify that the HT was correct.

is a good option. It has better pitting/crevice corrosion resistance than 316.It has much better CSCC resistance, it isn't immune but it has usable resistance.It has much higher strength, which usually leads to thinner tubes.You would likely go down to 0.065" or maybe thinner.And the CTE isn't that different from steel (much closer than an austenitic SS or Cu alloy).It is also widely available.When you order a duplex SS always specify A923, without accepting on the micro.This will require a special corrosion test to verify that the HT was correct.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, consulting work welcomed

RE: Heat Exchanger Tubes

rscosta

(Materials)

8 Mar 24 11:06

Without more details it is hard to provide a good answer.

There is no question that either copper alloys, super duplex SS and other corrosion resistant alloys would offer great benefits over carbon steel. However, I can think of
cases where carbon steel utilization is acceptable depending of the cooling water system type and respective water treatment program. As an example, many close loop CW systems present very low corrosion rates for well (chemically) treated systems.

Thanks

RE: Heat Exchanger Tubes

EdStainless

(Materials)

8 Mar 24 17:53
Most plants will not do this, saying that it costs too much to shut down.
But they take a system that would have lasted 20 years and destroy it in one day.
What does that cost?
It is a rare discipline.

The catch with most CS cooling water systems that rely on treatment is that you have to have procedures in place that assure if treatment is lost that the system will be shut down.Most plants will not do this, saying that it costs too much to shut down.But they take a system that would have lasted 20 years and destroy it in one day.What does that cost?It is a rare discipline.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, consulting work welcomed

RE: Heat Exchanger Tubes

Krausen

(Mechanical)

24 Mar 24 12:11

Quote (EdStainless)

is a good option. It has better pitting/crevice corrosion resistance than 316.
It has much better CSCC resistance, it isn't immune but it has usable resistance.
It has much higher strength, which usually leads to thinner tubes.
You would likely go down to 0.065" or maybe thinner.
And the CTE isn't that different from steel (much closer than an austenitic SS or Cu alloy).
It is also widely available.
When you order a duplex SS always specify A923, without accepting on the micro.
This will require a special corrosion test to verify that the HT was correct.


EdStainless - What are your general thoughts on the tube-to-tubesheet joint design when using tubes with CS tubesheets? Being that is a much harder/stronger material compared to CS, do you typically strength/seal weld these joints to avoid any potential issues with rolling the harder tubes to the softer CS tubesheets? If so, do you recommend providing a weld overlay of (or 300 SS material) to the tubeside of the CS tubesheet to help match the metallurgy of the tube-to-tubesheet strength/seal welds?

EdStainless - What are your general thoughts on the tube-to-tubesheet joint design when using tubes with CS tubesheets? Being that is a much harder/stronger material compared to CS, do you typically strength/seal weld these joints to avoid any potential issues with rolling the harder tubes to the softer CS tubesheets? If so, do you recommend providing a weld overlay of (or 300 SS material) to the tubeside of the CS tubesheet to help match the metallurgy of the tube-to-tubesheet strength/seal welds?

RE: Heat Exchanger Tubes

EdStainless

(Materials)

25 Mar 24 15:56
But it really depends on how corrosive the service is.
If CS tubesheets will hold up then use stronger CS grades so that they are closer to the strength of the .
The yield strength of isn't that high, and with thinner tubes this shouldn't be an issue to roll.
I have seen much greater differences work fine.
Seal welding will work but if you are welding directly to CS you will likely need a Ni alloy filler (C276?).
The most common solution is no weld and to shop epoxy coat the tubesheets.
A three layer high build system will be very durable and seal very well.
I am not a fan of overlay for these lower alloys.
Duplex overlays are problematic because of trying to achieve phase balance (issues with both cooling rate and dilution).
Using a 316L overlay in two layers would likely cost as much as a solid SS tubesheet.
Just not worth it.

Ideally I would like to see tube sheets. You would need this for strength welds.But it really depends on how corrosive the service is.If CS tubesheets will hold up then use stronger CS grades so that they are closer to the strength of the .The yield strength of isn't that high, and with thinner tubes this shouldn't be an issue to roll.I have seen much greater differences work fine.Seal welding will work but if you are welding directly to CS you will likely need a Ni alloy filler (C276?).The most common solution is no weld and to shop epoxy coat the tubesheets.A three layer high build system will be very durable and seal very well.I am not a fan of overlay for these lower alloys.Duplex overlays are problematic because of trying to achieve phase balance (issues with both cooling rate and dilution).Using a 316L overlay in two layers would likely cost as much as a solid SS tubesheet.Just not worth it.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, consulting work welcomed

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.


Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News

For more stainless steel heat exchanger tubeinformation, please contact us. We will provide professional answers.