This is part one of a two part series
You can find more information on our web, so please take a look.
There has been a long-standing, unresolved debate over whether graphite or copper is a better EDM electrode material. The preference is most always the same in any one geographical region. In North America, the preferred electrode material has shifted from copper to graphite. In Europe and Asia, many argue that copper is the preferable material.
Without question, graphite is the predominantly used electrode material in the United States, where at least 95 percent of electrodes are produced from this material. Steady increases in graphite use in Europe over the past decade have resulted in an electrode material ratio of 75 percent graphite to 25 percent copper. Asia follows with estimations of 45 percent graphite versus 55 percent copper. Perhaps it&#;s time to take a closer look at both materials to identify the differences and help you select the one that is most appropriate for your EDM applications.
Graphite is produced with a wide range of material characteristics, enabling you to match the electrode material properties to the EDM application. Less-critical applications with electrode features such as a large radius, an open tolerance or minimal EDM requirements would use an economically-priced graphite material with large particles and lower strengths. However, a highly detailed electrode with critical features, extreme tolerances and stringent EDM requirements would entail a more premium graphite to fit the needs of this application.
On the other hand, due to the high purity value required for efficient EDMing, the types of copper available on the market and used in EDM applications are limited. This minimizes the ability to match material characteristics to the EDM application. The most commonly used types are electrolytic copper and tellurium copper, which vary slightly in elemental composition and are both cast as a solid.
Copper is often considered a commodity material and can be less costly than graphite in the bulk or blank stage. Many graphite materials are considered specialty materials and, as such, can be more costly. In addition, copper is recyclable whereas graphite is limited in its ability to be reclaimed. However, with the wide range of graphite materials available on the market today, it is possible to find some low-quality EDM grades that are more economical than copper. To establish the true cost of copper versus graphite, the value of machining the electrode must also be considered. Even with the more expensive graphite materials, the machining costs often offset any savings that are realized with the copper.
For example, a quote was recently solicited for a simple electrode blank with a ground finish on the top and bottom. The quote was received with copper at $4.68 per cubic inch, while a premium grade of graphite was quoted at $6.80 per cubic inch, or 45 percent more costly. However, when the cost of machining a simple, finished electrode was included, the story changed. In this case, the finished graphite electrode was quoted at $15.50 each, whereas the copper electrode (&#;oxygen free&#;) was quoted as $95 each. Due to the soft, ductile characteristic of copper, it is often gummy, and conventional machining practices (such as feeds and speeds) must be altered to accommodate. This can be mitigated with tellurium copper, but EDM performance may be jeopardized. On the other hand, graphite is not gummy and can be conventionally machined very easily. However, machining graphite generates significant dust, which must be collected through an effective vacuum system with HEPA-type filtration.
In EDM applications, the electrical current tends to concentrate at sharp edges and corners. Copper&#;s low melting point does not allow it to handle current density as effectively as graphite, so features on a single copper electrode must be similar in detail. It is not wise to EDM with varying details on the same copper electrode. This is because the higher current required to efficiently EDM larger electrode details exceeds the current allowable for the smaller detail.
With copper electrodes, high current density on smaller, more intricate detail increases the electrode wear. Also, when machining intricate detail or EDMing at high current densities, a copper electrode may move or flex as material stress is relieved. This limits the ability to maintain the very tight tolerances required on many of today&#;s molds. Graphite performs very well at a high current density even with complex geometry. Graphite electrodes allow for efficient EDMing, even with varying details on the same electrode. Therefore, the number of graphite electrodes required to perform a job can be significantly reduced.
Figure 1 shows the results achieved by one shop that combined several electrode details into one graphite electrode instead of multiple copper electrodes. This particular mold required more than 100 copper electrodes to complete the job, while fewer than 30 graphite electrodes were required. In addition, with metallic electrodes, the machining process creates rough edges or &#;burrs&#; that must be removed. This deburring process is typically done by hand. With graphite, no burr is created in the machining process and as such, the deburring step is eliminated.Figure 1 shows the results achieved by one shop that combined several electrode details into one graphite electrode instead of multiple copper electrodes. This particular mold required more than 100 copper electrodes to complete the job, while fewer than 30 graphite electrodes were required. In addition, with metallic electrodes, the machining process creates rough edges or &#;burrs&#; that must be removed. This deburring process is typically done by hand. With graphite, no burr is created in the machining process and as such, the deburring step is eliminated.
An electrode material&#;s thermophysical properties determine its ability to process the energy of the EDM cut and remove metal. In generating a spark, peak current is discharged only after the gap between the electrode and workpiece has been ionized. At this point, the electrode emits electrons that collide with the molecules of the dielectric fluid. As a result, the fluid is vaporized and an energy channel is formed that allows the spark to take place. For this to happen, the electrode material must be hot enough for electrons to absorb enough energy to escape and work to create the energy channel.
For copper electrodes to release electrons in the gap, the temperature must be high enough for these electrons to absorb sufficient energy.1 As a result, these high temperatures tend to burn some of the copper electrode away. In order to generate this heat, the on times for copper electrodes are generally much higher than for graphite electrodes. However, due to its carbon base, a graphite electrode is able to emit these electrons at much lower temperatures and does not require the extended on times for electrons to release and create the energy channel. Therefore, the time required to form the energy channel is considerably less. Since the graphite initializes the spark faster, significantly higher metal removal rates are the result.
Electrode wear is a constant concern because excessive wear results in adding electrodes or redressing electrodes more often. Graphite is able to achieve electrode wear of less than 1 percent in relation to the depth of cut at machine parameters much more aggressive than copper electrodes. This is achieved through a &#;replating&#; process during which molten particles from the workpiece may penetrate into the structure of the graphite electrode and reduce the amount of wear caused by the EDM process. The melting temperature of most standard work metals being EDMed is around 1,500°C. This exceeds that of copper, which is around 1,100°C. Any molten particles being ejected out of the EDM cut are likely to carry a thermoelectric charge and have temperatures that do not permit them to affix to the copper electrode. In this case, the molten particles may actually create secondary discharging and erode the copper electrode away.
This means that the high amperage and long on times of a roughing condition (and the process of replating) actually preserve the graphite electrode but is detrimental to the copper electrode which erodes away at these settings. On the contrary, in the finishing stages, with low amperage and short on-times, the graphite electrode has a tendency to wear at a faster rate than copper. However, since electrode wear is a ratio of the amount of material removed in the EDM cut, the actual wear on either a graphite or copper electrode is minimal in the finishing stage and sometimes immeasurable.
Because it is cast as a solid with no porosity, it goes without saying that copper electrodes provide very fine surface finishes. However, with the sophistication of today&#;s EDM sinker technology, the surface finish gap between graphite and copper has narrowed significantly. Fine-grain graphite electrodes are now able to deliver surface finishes similar to copper with comparable electrode wear. With the proper electrode material selection and machine parameters, graphite is able to achieve near mirror finishes without the use of a powder additive and mirror-like finishes with the additive.
Figure 2 - A fine surface finish can be achieved with an appropriate graphite electrode material and proper machine parameters.
Figure 2 shows EDM test cuts measuring 0.260 by 0.510 inch. The two pockets on the right were machined to a depth of 0.100 inch with an 8 VDI finish using graphite and standard EDM technology without a powder additive. This is a very good finish for a fine-grain graphite. While copper can achieve finer surface finishes (down to 0 VDI), they are not often required in EDM. Finer surface finishes are generally achieved by a post-EDM polishing process, regardless of the electrode type used.
Conducting test burns and tracking results will help determine the monetary impact that the electrode material has on an EDM application. Part 2 of this article will review the results of EDM testing conducted with both graphite and copper, and reveal the bottom-line cost for each. With all of this information, you will then be able make an informed decision on the electrode material type best suited for a specific EDM application.
Next Article &#; Part 2: Graphite vs Copper Electrode Material for EDM Applications.
Zhongsheng are exported all over the world and different industries with quality first. Our belief is to provide our customers with more and better high value-added products. Let's create a better future together.
Figure 1: An example of a graphite electrode.
Figure 6: Copper also can be used for photo engraving and acid etching.
Figure 2: Some new high-speed mills are specially designed to machine graphite - and can even cut square internal corners.
Figure 3: The finish on the graphite should be as good as you need in the mold.
Figure 5: Copper can be used for coining and forging.
Figure 4: Copper is useful in small cavities, where it is difficult to polish.
When it comes time to decide whether to use graphite or copper electrodes in your shop, it's important to look at the big picture. According to Stu Haley, regional manager of Belmont Technologies, Inc., a provider of EDM supplies, tooling, accessories and machines, "To say which electrode works best is very difficult, it is totally applications driven. So much depends on what you have to work with on your shop floor in the way of support equipment. Both copper and graphite provide approximately the same end result. The difference is time to EDM the work and electrode manufacturing time and cost."
Haley explains that choosing an electrode material is often a result of where you were born and what type of EDM equipment you use. "For example, graphite was basically developed in the United States back in the early s, so the American EDM equipment manufacturers in those days concentrated on the graphite circuitry when designing their equipment," he says. "Whereas, since the European and Asian EDM equipment manufacturers didn't have access to graphite, they developed copper circuitry.
"If you have newer equipment built after , the electrode material of choice in North America is graphite," he adds. "This is used in 90% of the applications. In Europe and Asia, graphite is becoming more popular as an electrode material because of availability, machinability and speed of cutting."
Following are some of the advantages and disadvantages of each material so that you can decide which is best for your application.
Sold by grades, graphite cuts approximately three times faster than copper, according to Haley. "What makes a good grade or a poor grade is particle size," he explains. "Particle size gives you strength, machinability and greatly influences the metal removal rate, wear and the surface finish. Graphite is made up of carbon particles that are put through a graphitizing process to produce graphite. The smaller the particle size is, the better the graphite. Particle sizes in different grades of graphite can be ." for general-purpose use to ." for the extremely fine detail and superior surface finishes. Graphite can be purchased in big blocks, and then cut up to be machined; or it can be ordered precut or ground into the size you require.
"Graphite machines very easily &#; you can mill it, grind it, turn it, drill it, tap it, even file it to whatever shape you want," Haley continues. "Another advantage of graphite is that it doesn't burr. You can put it on a duplicating machine or a graphite high-speed mill and cut out complex shapes and forms, and once it's cut you are finished &#; with no deburring." (See Figure 1)
Additionally, graphite's high melting temperature results in less wear than other electrode materials, so a mold could be cut with one or two electrodes on a CNC EDM machine with very little wear, Haley adds. "A CNC sinker may need a third or forth electrode to finish the mold," he notes. "It depends on the age of the EDM machines."
If your shop has older fabricating equipment, machining graphite electrodes will result in dust particles on the shop floor and in the nearby machines. However, the new high-speed mills that are sold today are specially designed to machine graphite. "They are totally enclosed and have a vacuum system to remove all of the dust," Haley points out, "and there are some machines that can even cut square internal corners." (See Figure 2)
Another important point to keep in mind is that the finish on any electrode is the finish that will be put in the mold. "So, if you have a lot of cutter or grinding marks on the electrode, you will reproduce that in your mold," Haley says. "Normally, the finish on the graphite should be as good as you need in the mold." (See Figure 3)
Haley notes that copper can be cut on wire EDM machines, but there are only certain graphites that can be cut on a wire machine &#; the particle size should be five microns or less. Copper also is a little more forgiving in a poor flush situation than graphite. "In EDM, if the flush doesn't remove the eroded particles or chips out of the cutting area, there's something that can occur where you get a non-pulsating, direct flow of current from the electrode to the workpiece," Haley explains. "The result of this is a pit in the workpiece. Copper is more forgiving in those applications &#; all metallic electrodes are &#; they won't arc out as fast. But some of the newer EDM power supplies have adaptive logic or fuzzy logic, which eliminates the problem altogether. Copper &#; when used at specific settings with the correct flushing techniques using a CNC machine or a machine with an orbiting system &#; can produce a mirror-like surface finish. This is useful in small cavities where it is difficult to polish." (See Figure 4)
When you add tungsten to copper (copper tungsten), the result is an electrode material that has extremely good wear characteristics but is very difficult to machine, Haley notes. "When EDM'ing carbide, this is the best metallic electrode material to use. The best graphite material would be copper graphite, which is graphite impregnated with copper," he says.
According to Haley, there are alternative ways of machining copper &#; including coining (see Figure 5), forging, photo engraving/acid etching (see Figure 6) and stamping/forming. There are some shops that make a form and then copper plate it.
"Copper is more difficult to machine," Haley says, "and when you mill it, it has the tendency to stick to the cutter. When you grind it, it can clog up the grinding wheel. It heats up quickly and has a tendency to grab the grinding wheel. You'll have burrs no matter how you machine it, so you have to deburr it. Size and weight also can be an issue. A 12" x 7" x 2 3/4" piece of copper weighs 75 pounds, whereas a piece of graphite the same size is 11 pounds.
"The bottom line is use what you think will work best in your shop with the equipment that you have available," Haley continues. "If some electrodes are beyond your machining ability, have someone make them for you. You have to base it on your own experience and the resources you have available. Ask for suggestions from the equipment manufacturer or from your electrode material supplier. Regardless of what electrode material or combination of materials you decide on, be sure that you know the speeds and feeds to machine the material safely. When in doubt, ask."
Contact us to discuss your requirements of Regular Power Graphite Electrodes. Our experienced sales team can help you identify the options that best suit your needs.